--- /dev/null
+This paper describes our approaches for the Plagiarism Detection task
+of PAN 2013.
+
+We present modified three-way search methodology for source retrieval subtask.
+TODO Neco podrobnejsiho.
+
+For the text alignment subtask, we use the similar approach as in PAN 2012.
+We detect common features of various types between the suspicious and source
+documents. We have experimented with more types of features. The best
+results had the combination of sorted word 4-grams with unsorted stop-word
+8-grams. From the common features we compute valid intervals, which map
+passages from the suspicious document to the passages of the source document,
+such that these passages are covered ``densely enough'' with corresponding
+common features. For PAN 2013, we have modified the postprocessing phase:
+the fact that the algorithm had access to the whole corpus of source and
+suspicious documents at once allowed us to process the documents in one
+batch and to perform a global post-processing, handling the overlapping
+detections not only between the given suspicious and source document,
+but also between all the detections from a given suspicious document.
+The modifications brought a significant improvement compared to PAN 2013
+on a training corpus, and the results from the competition corpus
+are similar enough to claim that these improvements are usable in general.
%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
\begin{document}
-\title{Diverse Queries and Feature Type Selection for Pairwise Document Comparison}
+\title{Diverse Queries and Feature Type Selection for Plagiarism Discovery}
%%% Please do not remove the subtitle.
\subtitle{Notebook for PAN at CLEF 2013}
on uncovering plagiarism, authorship, and social software misuse.
We present modified three-way search methodology for Source Retrieval subtask and analyse snippet similarity performance.
The results show, that presented approach is adaptable in real-world plagiarism situations.
-For the Detailed Comparison task, we discuss feature type selection,
-global postprocessing. We significantly improved the pairwise comparison
-results with even further optimizations possible.
+For the Detailed Comparison task, we discuss feature type selection and
+global postprocessing. Resulting performance is significantly better
+with the described modifications, and further improvement is still possible.
\end{abstract}
especially well for human-created plagiarism (the 05-summary-obfuscation\r
sub-corpus), which is where we want to focus for our production\r
systems\footnote{Our production systems include the Czech National Archive\r
-of Graduate Theses, \url{http://theses.cz}}.\r
+of Graduate Theses,\\ \url{http://theses.cz}}.\r
\r
% After the final evaluation, we did further experiments\r
%with feature types, and discovered that using stop-word 8-grams,\r