<?xml version="1.0"?>
<!-- name="generator" content="blosxom/2.0" -->
<!DOCTYPE rss PUBLIC "-//Netscape Communications//DTD RSS 0.91//EN" "http://my.netscape.com/publish/formats/rss-0.91.dtd">

<rss version="0.91">
  <channel>
    <title>Yenya's World   </title>
    <link>https://www.fi.muni.cz/~kas/blog/index.cgi</link>
    <description>Linux and beyond - Yenya's blog.</description>
    <language>en</language>

<item>
	<title>GNOME-Only Applications</title>
	<link>https://www.fi.muni.cz/~kas/blog/index.cgi/computers/desktops/gnome-only-apps.html</link>
	<guid>https://www.fi.muni.cz/~kas/blog/index.cgi/computers/desktops/gnome-only-apps.html</guid>
	<description>&lt;p&gt;Once upon a time, there was a windowing system called X. There were lots
of applications for X written using various widget toolkits. In order to make
the window operations unified across the whole desktop, regardless of the
widget toolkit used by a particular application, the special application,
called "window manager" provided window title bars and borders.
Applications could inform the window manager about their particular needs
(for example, their minimum required window size, etc.) using an open
protocol called &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inter-Client_Communication_Conventions_Manual"&gt;ICCCM&lt;/a&gt;. Not anymore.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;[... read more ...]&lt;/p&gt;</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2015 14:09:00 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Multiseat LightDM</title>
	<link>https://www.fi.muni.cz/~kas/blog/index.cgi/computers/desktops/multiseat-lightdm.html</link>
	<guid>https://www.fi.muni.cz/~kas/blog/index.cgi/computers/desktops/multiseat-lightdm.html</guid>
	<description>&lt;p&gt;After getting a new mainboard, I have upgraded my home computer to Fedora 20,
and made my multiseat setup use the &lt;a
href="http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/systemd/multiseat/"&gt;&lt;tt&gt;udev/logind/loginctl&lt;/tt&gt;
seat tags&lt;/a&gt;. About a month ago I have discovered that the seat numbers are not
correctly assigned to sessions by &lt;tt&gt;xdm(8)&lt;/tt&gt;, so I started to look for
solutions. Of course, that piece of crap called &lt;tt&gt;gdm&lt;/tt&gt;
was not even been considered
&lt;a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451562"&gt;for obvious reasons&lt;/a&gt;.
Apparently the solution does &lt;i&gt;exist&lt;/i&gt;, and suprisingly enough, it is
really nice: it is called &lt;a href="http://www.freedesktop.org/wiki/Software/LightDM/"&gt;LightDM&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;[... read more ...]&lt;/p&gt;</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2014 23:43:00 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Politically Correct Media Players</title>
	<link>https://www.fi.muni.cz/~kas/blog/index.cgi/computers/desktops/politically-correct-media-players.html</link>
	<guid>https://www.fi.muni.cz/~kas/blog/index.cgi/computers/desktops/politically-correct-media-players.html</guid>
	<description>&lt;p&gt;Hello, welcome to today's issue of your favourite "Bashing the Questionable
Fedora Desktop Decisions" series. Today, we will have a look at the
politically correct media players.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;[... read more ...]&lt;/p&gt;</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2014 11:38:00 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>File Manager</title>
	<link>https://www.fi.muni.cz/~kas/blog/index.cgi/computers/desktops/file-manager.html</link>
	<guid>https://www.fi.muni.cz/~kas/blog/index.cgi/computers/desktops/file-manager.html</guid>
	<description>&lt;p&gt;The last file manager I have used was Norton Commander back in the DOS era.
Many years after that, during the flame wars between proponents of spatial and
single-windowed Nautilus, I have only laughed at them, thinking that the command line
was much better. Why would anybody need a GUI file manager?
I feel slightly ashamed now, but I have to admit that for the last two weeks,
I have also been using a GUI file manager.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;[... read more ...]&lt;/p&gt;</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 16:57:00 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Desktop Environment-Specific Apps</title>
	<link>https://www.fi.muni.cz/~kas/blog/index.cgi/computers/desktops/de-specific-apps.html</link>
	<guid>https://www.fi.muni.cz/~kas/blog/index.cgi/computers/desktops/de-specific-apps.html</guid>
	<description>&lt;p&gt;I have recently came across &lt;a href="https://trac.transmissionbt.com/ticket/3685"&gt;this two years old bug report&lt;/a&gt;,
filled to the bug tracker of Transmission (a Bittorrent client) where a
GNOME developer suggests removal of the notification area icon from
the application on the basis that GNOME 3 does not support notification
area at all.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;[... read more ...]&lt;/p&gt;</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 12 Nov 2012 17:43:00 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Lost GUI features</title>
	<link>https://www.fi.muni.cz/~kas/blog/index.cgi/computers/desktops/lost-gui-features.html</link>
	<guid>https://www.fi.muni.cz/~kas/blog/index.cgi/computers/desktops/lost-gui-features.html</guid>
	<description>&lt;p&gt;Contemporary GUI applications have several problems which, if I remember
correctly, previous systems did not have. I wonder
whether somebody else also considers it being a problem:
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;[... read more ...]&lt;/p&gt;</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2011 14:30:00 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>GNOME 3</title>
	<link>https://www.fi.muni.cz/~kas/blog/index.cgi/computers/desktops/gnome-3.html</link>
	<guid>https://www.fi.muni.cz/~kas/blog/index.cgi/computers/desktops/gnome-3.html</guid>
	<description>&lt;p&gt;After installing Fedora 15 in a virtual machine, I have decided to give GNOME 3
a try. Firstly, it is really slow over VNC. While GNOME 2 has been pretty
usable for testing various new applications in a virtual machine, under
GNOME 3 it is almost impossible.
Here is a screenshot on which I will demonstrate my problems with GNOME 3:
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;[... read more ...]&lt;/p&gt;</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 20 May 2011 19:45:00 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>XFCE</title>
	<link>https://www.fi.muni.cz/~kas/blog/index.cgi/computers/desktops/xfce.html</link>
	<guid>https://www.fi.muni.cz/~kas/blog/index.cgi/computers/desktops/xfce.html</guid>
	<description>&lt;p&gt;The first alternative to GNOME I have decided to try is &lt;a href="http://www.xfce.org/"&gt;XFCE&lt;/a&gt;.
In the LWN discussion, &lt;a href="http://lwn.net/Articles/433547/"&gt;Jon Masters&lt;/a&gt;
presented it as a viable replacement to GNOME. Also, it uses GTK+ like GNOME,
so many applications can be the same (including, I have hoped, my window
manager of choice, &lt;a href="http://sawfish.wikia.com/"&gt;Sawfish&lt;/a&gt;.
XFCE is definitely usable and configurable for power-user. Most (but not
all) properties can also be set using their Settings manager, and thus
XFCE should also be mostly usable for ordinary users.
So far the problems include:
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;[... read more ...]&lt;/p&gt;</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 23 Mar 2011 18:09:00 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>GNOME in the Shell</title>
	<link>https://www.fi.muni.cz/~kas/blog/index.cgi/computers/desktops/gnome-in-the-shell.html</link>
	<guid>https://www.fi.muni.cz/~kas/blog/index.cgi/computers/desktops/gnome-in-the-shell.html</guid>
	<description>&lt;p&gt;Yesterday, after reading &lt;a href="http://lwn.net/Articles/433409/"&gt;The Grumpy Editor's GNOME 3 experience&lt;/a&gt; article at LWN, I have decided it is time
to at least make an attempt to move away from GNOME, which (much like KDE 4)
decided to use revolutionary instead of evolutionary development, and apparently
continues in their feature removal crusade in the name of so called usability.
Also, this might be a good chance to move away from Galeon after
&lt;a href="http://www.fi.muni.cz/~kas/blog/index.cgi/computers/time-for-new-browser.html"&gt;so many&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.fi.muni.cz/~kas/blog/index.cgi/2008/05/index.html"&gt;years&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;[... read more ...]&lt;/p&gt;</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2011 23:50:00 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>The GDM Fiasco</title>
	<link>https://www.fi.muni.cz/~kas/blog/index.cgi/computers/desktops/gdm-fiasco.html</link>
	<guid>https://www.fi.muni.cz/~kas/blog/index.cgi/computers/desktops/gdm-fiasco.html</guid>
	<description>&lt;p&gt;A short trip to the history: for GNOME 2.22 (two years ago, in the Fedora 9
timeframe) someone decided that it would be nice to completely rewrite the
GNOME display manager. So far so good, but they have decided to include
this partially rewritten piece of crap without many important features
(a display manager without XDMCP, WTF?) to the official GNOME and thus Fedora
releases.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;[... read more ...]&lt;/p&gt;</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 17:47:00 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Is Ekiga Doomed?</title>
	<link>https://www.fi.muni.cz/~kas/blog/index.cgi/computers/desktops/is-ekiga-doomed.html</link>
	<guid>https://www.fi.muni.cz/~kas/blog/index.cgi/computers/desktops/is-ekiga-doomed.html</guid>
	<description>&lt;p&gt;I am more-or-less happy user of &lt;a href="http://www.gnomemeeting.org/"&gt;ekiga&lt;/a&gt;.
However, with the latest GNOME release (or two), I am not sure about its future.
The new GNOME contains a new instant messaging and voice-over-IP application,
&lt;a href="http://live.gnome.org/Empathy"&gt;Empathy&lt;/a&gt;.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;[... read more ...]&lt;/p&gt;</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 12:47:00 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Firefox File Input</title>
	<link>https://www.fi.muni.cz/~kas/blog/index.cgi/computers/desktops/firefox-file-input.html</link>
	<guid>https://www.fi.muni.cz/~kas/blog/index.cgi/computers/desktops/firefox-file-input.html</guid>
	<description>&lt;p&gt;The daily user-interface annoyance award herby goes to the Firefox (or rather XULRunner,
which means this is present also in Galeon). The problem is in forms
in the &lt;code&gt;&amp;lt;input type="file"&amp;gt;&lt;/code&gt; fields. It looks like this:
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;[... read more ...]&lt;/p&gt;</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:04:00 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Browsers: Back to Square One</title>
	<link>https://www.fi.muni.cz/~kas/blog/index.cgi/computers/desktops/browsers-back-to-square-one.html</link>
	<guid>https://www.fi.muni.cz/~kas/blog/index.cgi/computers/desktops/browsers-back-to-square-one.html</guid>
	<description>&lt;p&gt;On Oct 15, 2005 i &lt;a
href="/~kas/blog/index.cgi/computers/time-for-new-browser.html"&gt;wrote&lt;/a&gt;
about &lt;a href="http://galeon.sourceforge.net/"&gt;Galeon&lt;/a&gt; development
slowing down, and I speculated that I would have needed to choose a new browser. With
&lt;a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443518"&gt;recent&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a href="https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446233"&gt;problems&lt;/a&gt;
of Galeon in Fedora 9, I have decided to look at the current state of
browsers again.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;[... read more ...]&lt;/p&gt;</description>
	<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 18:36:00 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>Ekiga, PulseAudio, and D-Bus</title>
	<link>https://www.fi.muni.cz/~kas/blog/index.cgi/computers/desktops/ekiga-pulseaudio-dbus.html</link>
	<guid>https://www.fi.muni.cz/~kas/blog/index.cgi/computers/desktops/ekiga-pulseaudio-dbus.html</guid>
	<description>&lt;p&gt;It seems that more and more applications start using
&lt;a href="http://dbus.freedesktop.org/"&gt;D-Bus&lt;/a&gt; for communication,
so it is time to get ones feet wet with the D-Bus programming.
&lt;a href="http://www.fedora.redhat.com/"&gt;Fedora&lt;/a&gt; 8 has
&lt;a href="http://www.pulseaudio.org/"&gt;PulseAudio&lt;/a&gt; enabled by default,
which conflicts with &lt;a href="http://www.ekiga.org/"&gt;Ekiga&lt;/a&gt;
because of &lt;a href="https://bugtrack.alsa-project.org/alsa-bug/view.php?id=2601"&gt;this ALSA bug&lt;/a&gt;
(see also the &lt;a href="http://www.pulseaudio.org/ticket/23"&gt;related PulseAudio
issue&lt;/a&gt;).
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;[... read more ...]&lt;/p&gt;</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 07 Dec 2007 17:34:00 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
	<title>XRandR</title>
	<link>https://www.fi.muni.cz/~kas/blog/index.cgi/computers/desktops/xrandr.html</link>
	<guid>https://www.fi.muni.cz/~kas/blog/index.cgi/computers/desktops/xrandr.html</guid>
	<description>&lt;p&gt;I have installed &lt;a href="http://fedoraproject.org/"&gt;Fedora&lt;/a&gt; 8 on my
workstation. Everything works as expected, except the multihead support.
I am getting the "&lt;code&gt;Requested Entity already in use!&lt;/code&gt;" error message.
The problem is that my &lt;code&gt;xorg.conf&lt;/code&gt; uses two separate screens,
instead of one screen merged by XRandR extension (which is
&lt;a href="http://www.phoronix.com/forums/showthread.php?t=4979"&gt;apparently&lt;/a&gt;
the preferred way of doing dual-head now).
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;[... read more ...]&lt;/p&gt;</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Nov 2007 18:46:00 +0100</pubDate>
</item>
  </channel>
</rss>